Checkpoint 4.5

4.5 — Special Education & Assistive TechnologyVerify state law

What this is

The technology and AI dimensions of special-education service delivery — assistive devices and software (AAC, Read&Write, Bookshare, screen readers, speech-to-text), IEP-aligned accommodations during AI use, sped-specific tech vetting and procurement, and the coordination between IT, special education, and curriculum staff that turns assistive tech into a learning advantage rather than a logistical burden. Distinct from general equity audit (1.8): this is the dedicated audit of how the technology ecosystem serves students with IEPs and 504 plans.

Why it matters

Federal law (IDEA) requires the IEP team to consider the assistive technology needs of every child with an IEP (34 CFR §300.324(a)(2)(v); 20 U.S.C. §1414(d)(3)(B)(v)), and to ensure AT devices and services are made available when required for FAPE (34 CFR §300.105). The depth of that consideration matters — it's most effective when AT is treated as ongoing curriculum partnership rather than one-time procurement. AI tools introduce new accommodations whose accuracy varies, making rigorous review more important.

Connects to

IDEA assistive-technology consideration requirements (federal). The Framework: Cognitive & Ethical Foundation — Sustained Attention, Knowledge Building & Retention. Cross-cuts 1.5 (Data Governance — sped data is sensitive), 1.6 (EdTech Vetting — assistive-tech vendors), 1.8 (Equity & Access — students with disabilities are a subgroup), and 2.1 / 2.2 (literacy scopes that need to address sped accommodations explicitly).

Maturity levels

Not Started
Assistive-technology decisions made reactively, IEP-by-IEP, without district-level coordination. No central assistive-tech inventory. Special-education staff make procurement decisions in isolation from general EdTech vetting. Most assistive tech in use is whatever a vendor recommended.
Emerging
Some district-level assistive-tech awareness. IEP teams have access to a shared list of approved tools, but the list is informal or out of date. Limited coordination between sped, IT, and curriculum teams. AI-specific accommodations (text-to-speech, AI reading support) handled case-by-case.
Established
Formal assistive-technology consideration process for every IEP. Central assistive-tech inventory maintained with regular vendor review. Special-education staff are full members of the EdTech vetting committee. IEP-aligned accommodations explicitly addressed in the digital and AI literacy curricula (2.1, 2.2). Annual training for sped staff on emerging AI accommodations.
Expanding
Assistive technology is treated as integral to the district's tech ecosystem, not a sped silo. AI accommodation tools are continuously reviewed for accuracy and equity (e.g., voice-quality bias in TTS, accent recognition in STT). Family training and self-advocacy support for students with disabilities. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is the curricular default, with assistive tech as the targeted adjustment. Outcomes data disaggregated by disability subgroup informs ongoing decisions.

Go deeper with

Example resource
QIAT — Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology
Also consider